How much money do I need to reach FIRE?
The core figure is 25× your annual spending. From the 4% rule (based on the Trinity Study, which found that withdrawing 4% of assets per year lasts 30+ years), target = annual spending ÷ 0.04 = annual spending × 25. ₩2.5M/month (₩30M/year) needs ₩750M; ₩4M/month (₩48M/year) needs ₩1.2B. A conservative 3.5% rate raises this to 28.6×; an aggressive 5% drops it to 20×.
What exactly is the 4% rule, and does it work in Korea?
From the 1998 Trinity University study: if you withdraw 4% of assets in year one and adjust withdrawals for inflation each year afterward, the probability of depleting your portfolio over 30 years is very low. But it's based on US stock/bond history, so Korean residents — facing FX risk, foreign-ETF capital gains tax (22%), and lower bond yields — often apply a conservative 3.3-3.5% instead.
How is Coast FIRE different from regular FIRE?
Coast FIRE is the point where you've saved enough that compounding alone, with zero additional saving, will carry you to your target by retirement age. Save a sufficient seed by 35, and even saving ₩0 afterward you'll hit the target at 65. While Standard FIRE means 'enough to quit today,' Coast FIRE means 'enough to ease off the savings accelerator' — reached far sooner. This calculator supports both modes.
What do Lean FIRE and Fat FIRE mean?
They classify retirement by lifestyle. Lean FIRE is a frugal retirement on under ~₩20M/year (target under ~₩500M); Fat FIRE is a comfortable retirement on ₩80M-100M+/year (target ₩2B+); Regular FIRE sits in between. Barista FIRE means working part-time to cover the gap. All use the same 4% rule — just change the monthly-expense input to see each type's required assets instantly.
Why is a 3.5% withdrawal rate safer?
A lower rate means you draw down a smaller share each year, so the principal lasts longer. The 4% figure assumes a 30-year retirement, but someone retiring in their 40s-50s faces a 40-60 year horizon, raising depletion risk. So earlier retirees are advised to use 3.25-3.5% (28-30× annual spending). Adjusting the withdrawal-rate input here shows how the target grows non-linearly as the rate falls.
How much faster do I reach FIRE if I already have assets?
Existing assets compound from day one, so the effect is large. For a ₩900M target with ₩300M current assets, ₩2M monthly saving, and 7% return, you may reach FIRE 8-10+ years sooner than starting from zero. Compounding accelerates over time, so a larger initial seed makes the final stretch — where 'assets grow on their own' — far more powerful.
Which matters more: monthly savings or return rate?
It depends on your time horizon. In the first 10 years, monthly savings (your savings rate) dominate, because small balances make compounding negligible. Over 20+ years, a 1-2pp difference in annual return can swing your final assets by hundreds of millions of won. Generally, the key to FIRE is a high savings rate (50%+ of income), while return strategy is to track the market via diversified index funds (S&P 500, total-world ETFs).
How does this calculator handle taxes?
Your input tax rate is applied to each month's investment gain (interest/appreciation) before compounding. For Korean residents, deposit/bond interest is generally taxed 15.4% (income 14% + local 1.4%), and foreign stock/ETF capital gains 22% (after a ₩2.5M annual deduction). Actual tax varies greatly by sale timing and account type (ISA/pension accounts reduce tax), so this is an estimate using a single average rate.
What's a realistic way to reach FIRE faster?
Mathematically, the most powerful lever for your FIRE date is your savings rate. A widely cited figure: saving 25% of income takes ~32 years, 50% takes ~17 years, and 65% takes ~10.5 years. So: ① cut spending to raise your savings rate, ② use tax-advantaged accounts (ISA, pension savings, IRP) to lower taxes, and ③ raise income via side work or promotion and funnel the increase into savings. Controlling spending acts more directly than raising income.
Can my assets keep growing even after retirement?
Yes. The 4% rule is conservative by design — historically, in many scenarios assets were larger after 30 years than at the start. When your real return (stocks' long-run real ~7%) exceeds the 4% withdrawal rate, the portfolio grows net even while you withdraw. The caveat is 'sequence of returns risk': a steep market drop in the first few years can shrink assets fast, so withdrawing conservatively early on is safer.